McKinsey's new research confirms the operating model is why great strategy under delivers. Here's what that means at founder scale.

McKinsey just published research showing that even high-performing companies have a 30% gap between their strategy's full potential and what actually gets delivered. The culprit isn't the strategy, it's the operating model i.e. the way the organisation is actually structured to execute it. McKinsey identifies four outcomes every operating model should deliver: clarity, speed, skills, and commitment.

It's a rigorous, well-evidenced article built for large organisations with the executive bandwidth and budget to redesign 12 interlocking elements simultaneously. Most founder-led businesses can not match that, but the gap exists at founder scale too.

Clarity at founder scale is about founder time.

McKinsey defines clarity as resources and accountabilities aligned to strategy. In a large organisation that means teams, budgets, and reporting lines. In a founder-led business, the scarcest resource is generally the founder's time and clarity means knowing precisely where that time should go and, just as importantly, where it shouldn't.

The founder who is still inside delivery, still managing client relationships that should be owned by someone else, still approving decisions that should be made without them, that founder has an operating model problem. Not a strategy problem. The strategy is probably fine. The operating model hasn't caught up with it.

Speed at founder scale is blocked by undecided decisions.

McKinsey frames speed as fast, tech-enabled, frictionless workflows. At founder scale, what slows things down is often a decision that hasn't been made and it's creating drag on everything downstream.

A hiring decision that keeps being deferred. A technology investment that's been reviewed three times and still isn't committed. A pricing change everyone knows needs to happen but no one will commit to. Every week those decisions wait, the business moves more slowly than it should, because the absence of a decision is itself a constraint.

Skills at founder scale is a right-seat-right-now question.

McKinsey talks about future-ready workforces and talent sourcing strategy. At founder scale, the skills question is almost never that abstract. It's immediate: do I have the right person in the right role right now and am I clear on precisely what capability the business is missing?

The founder who keeps hiring people who can do things without being clear on what constraint each hire is designed to remove is building a team, not solving a problem. Skills at this scale is a decision problem before it's a talent problem.

Commitment at founder scale is a product of clarity.

McKinsey frames commitment as culture, a shared set of behaviours, reinforced by rewards, that creates a performance-oriented environment. At founder scale, culture problems are almost always direction problems in disguise. People commit to what they understand. When direction shifts frequently, when priorities aren't named, when the founder's own focus is spread across too many things, commitment follows or rather, it doesn't.

A founder who wants more commitment from their team almost always needs to make a clearer decision about where the business is going and what matters most right now. Then we address the culture as a lever.

The McKinsey research is right about the problem. The strategy-to-performance gap is an operating model problem, not a strategy problem. And the four outcomes: clarity, speed, skills, commitment are the right frame for diagnosing where the gap sits.

The prescription doesn't translate directly. A founder-led business at $10M to $30M revenue doesn't need a 12-element redesign but it would benefit greatly from one or two structural decisions made well. Where the founder's time goes and which capability gap is limiting everything downstream.

That's a different kind of work. But it starts in the same place: naming which of the four outcomes is most broken right now, and making the call that moves it.

→ If the gap between your strategy and your results feels familiar, a fit conversation is 20 minutes and free. Book here

→ McKinsey Article link: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/a-new-operating-model-for-a-new-world?cid=soc-web

#BusinessStrategy #OperatingModel #AustralianFounders #FounderDecisions #SMEAustralia #DecisionAdvisory #BusinessGrowth #OwnerOperator

Next
Next

The most expensive sentence in any business